AI-assisted peer review, tailored to your editorial workflow

Make Faster, Higher-Quality Editorial Decisions with AI-Assisted Screening, Customizable Editorial Workflows, and Verifiable Mathematical Formalization.

ProReview combines Lean-based mathematical formalization with expert editorial insights to support AI-assisted editorial decisions backed by verifiable evidence. Editors make faster, better-informed decisions through targeted screening and customizable workflows, while referees benefit from advanced mathematical verification tools.

Set by each editor
Your questions
Your letters
Your workflow
Scroll

01 · For Department editors and Associate editors

Better Editorial Decisions through AI-Assisted Screening and Summarization

In control

AI-Assisted, Not AI-Decided

AI adapts to editors' workflows and preferences, helping them screen manuscripts, summarize findings, and make informed decisions while keeping editors in control.

Screening

Professional Editorial Screening

AI-assisted evaluation of each manuscript's positioning, novelty, contributions, technical merit, and correctness.

Your workflow

Tailored to Your Editorial Workflow

Compatible with existing peer-review platforms and customizable to editors' screening and report-drafting preferences.

Discussion

In-Depth Discussions

An interactive platform for engaging with AI, editors, and referees in discussions ranging from broad questions about a manuscript to detailed technical contributions.

02 · For referees

Better Technical Evaluation through Lean-Based Mathematical Verification

Structure

Lean-Based Visualization

Understand the paper's theoretical structure through Lean-backed formalization.

Lean code

Traceability

Store and download generated Lean code for independent verification and documentation.

Priority

Ranked by Importance

Prioritize technical issues based on their significance and severity.

Refinement

Self-Improving

Independently verify, revise, and refine debatable nodes within the system.

Stage 01 · Screen

Screen and decide

With AI assistance, the Department editor reads each new submission against their own screening questions and can follow up on any answer.

The editor understands each paper quickly and thoroughly, then decides with the evidence in front of them: send it to peer review, or desk-reject it.

For · Department editors
Stage 02 · Verify

Evidence-based Technical Screening

Once the Department editor sends a paper to peer review, it goes to an Associate editor and referees. ProReview then formalizes the paper's mathematics in Lean for a deeper analysis, testing whether its technical arguments hold and backing each finding with evidence.

Associate editors and referees start from a detailed, well-informed analysis of the paper, work that would otherwise take days to verify by hand.

For · Associate editors and referees
Stage 03 · Discuss

Interactive and Interpretable Platform

ProReview makes complex research easier to read, interpret and discuss. Each point in the analysis can be traced to its evidence and taken up in an interactive discussion.

Through screening, formalization, discussion and each round of revision, editors, referees and authors work from the same evidence. That common ground closes gaps in technical understanding and moves scientific communication forward.

For · All editors and referees
Sources

Every answer shows where it came from.

Each statement points to the part of the paper or the published work it rests on, so editors can check it.

Decisions

A draft never becomes a decision on its own.

Editors review, edit and submit every decision themselves.

Analysis

Technical analysis is powered by advanced AI-for-Math formalization models.

Through LeanNexus, these models restate the paper's results in Lean, a proof language a computer can check, and report what holds, what fails and where.

Now in beta

Screen your next submission from a sourced brief.

Start with one journal. We set up ProReview for your editors and run it on the submissions you choose.